I just finished watching the final season of Breaking Bad yesterday. Wow! The descent
into madness brings the story to fitting end.
How I am like Walter White:
·
Went to chemistry grad school at Caltech. Check.
·
Did not pursue startup company with classmates.
Check.
·
Went into teaching instead. Check.
·
Experienced hair loss in midlife. Check.
·
Has an iconic black “hat”. Check.
·
Progressed into position involving managing
chemicals and money. Check.
Okay, maybe that’s stretching things a little. Although some
of my labmates in graduate school started a company, I don’t remember its name
any longer so I’m guessing it did not make billions of dollars. I almost went into high school chemistry
teaching after my postdoc but through an interesting turn of events ended up
teaching at the college level. I have only a little hair loss but am convinced
my bald patch is widening. My black “hat” is really a cap, but it is indeed iconic. Students recognize me very easily and
when they can’t remember my name (not Heisenberg, and thankfully no student has
called me that yet), they simply refer to me as the professor with the
backwards cap. I suspect staff and administrators do the same. Last but not
least, since I am department chair, I am in a position managing a fairly large
budget that goes to personnel, instrumentation and chemicals.
Unlike Walter White however, I am very unskilled and have
“poor hands in lab”. This probably explains why I am a computational chemist.
Using a computer I can actually build NC10H15 with 100%
purity. I can even calculate its molecular properties although these are an
approximation partly thanks to the principle formulated by the real Heisenberg.
I can color all my molecules blue in any hue, although by default only nitrogen
is blue. Carbons are grey and hydrogens are white. I do wear a lab coat when I
teach chemistry lab or when my office gets too cold. I should probably also have a proper full medical check-up
done at some point, maybe when I reach the age of 50 just in case. Unlike
Walter White though, I don’t have enough skills to do any good lab synthesis.
So I can't resort to a Breaking Bad fallback plan (at least not in the same way).
It was my students who first told me about Breaking Bad. (I
don’t own a TV and therefore don’t watch.) I had started watching a few TV
series on DVD but after a season or two, I typically found that the show no
longer holds my interest. The storytelling feels contrived and I no longer feel
immersed in it, so much so that I start “being a scientist” and picking apart
the show. Then it’s no longer fun. My brother is an aficionado in military
hardware from both world wars. On the occasions we would watch an old war movie
growing up, he would annoyingly point that out the German tank was actually an
American tank with a German insignia. Or that the heavy machine gun used by the
Russians was actually British. We would have to keep telling him to keep quiet
and just enjoy the movie. (He also enjoys pointing out where newer movies do a better job in terms of authencity.) I happen to enjoy movies with sci-fi, technology,
superpowers or magic, particularly if they are coupled with lots of action and
pyrotechnics. However to enjoy these movies I have learned to “suspend
disbelief” and just go along for the ride.
In his book Don’t be
such a Scientist, Randy Olson says that sometimes accuracy is NOT the most
important thing in communication. Instead, one really needs to think carefully
about the message, the audience, and the medium used. Not having accuracy as
the top priority is anathema to most scientists. We are trained to be nitpicky
and critical. However you don’t have to be a scientist to complain when the
movie adaptation of your favorite book (possibly the Harry Potter series) is
butchered by not adhering to the true or accurate story as told in the original
writings. More on that in a later post when I analyze some of the Harry
Potter movies.
There isn’t actually much chemistry in Breaking Bad, at least in terms of the central science. (There is
other great chemistry in the show!) I admit that my critical radar would automatically perk up
whenever science was discussed. This was most often in the first season
when the scene would cut briefly to Mr. White teaching his class. The show also
isn’t high-octane action all the time. Instead it slowly and surely builds
the story while keeping the viewer engaged and immersed. There are times where I get completely
immersed in my class prep or in my research project when working through a
complex idea. There are even some admin tasks (usually involving a puzzle like
course scheduling) that can be immersive. (I also get immersed in the act of teaching, but that's a different story.)
Chemistry is complex, non-intuitive, and perceived as a
“hard subject” (to which I don’t disagree). How do I create an immersive
environment in the classroom? How can I help my students see the value of and enjoy
engaging and immersing themselves in the material? These are questions I will
continue to wrestle with as a teacher and a scientist.
No comments:
Post a Comment