Discovery, Creativity and Serendipity in chemical research –
that’s the topic in my Research Methods classes (I teach two sections) this past
week. The students read interviews with famous chemists, and we talked about
what we found surprising in the backgrounds, motivations and stories of these
individuals. Following the lead of my colleague who taught the class last year,
I have been trying to incorporate a “creativity stoker” in each class session.
These are fun ten-minute activities to help the students get their creativity
juices going.
The students had just been assigned their working groups for
the semester. They will put together an original research proposal attempting
to answer one aspect of a “Big Unsolved Problem” in chemistry. For their first
activity as a team, so they could get to know each other and brainstorm, I used
an exercise that my colleague had developed. The assignment: Come up with
tweets to describe discovery, creativity and serendipity. Here are the three
prompts.
·
Define “Discovery” in scientific research in
under 140 characters.
·
Define “Creativity” in scientific research in
under 140 characters.
·
Define “Serendipity” in scientific research in
under 140 characters.
The team that I thought did the best job came up with these
three.
·
Discovery:
Gathering and uncovering of new knowledge and applications on topics of
interest using the scientific method
·
Creativity:
Thinking outside the box and making old things new, applying them to pursue
innovative ideas
·
Serendipity:
Happy accident, finding something by chance. Making your own luck by being open
to opportunities, identifying them and acting on them.
From the other teams, here are three others that I thought
were fun and clever:
·
Discovery:
Diminishment of the unknown through exploration which generates new ideas.
·
Creativity:
Coloring outside the molecule. #creative
·
Serendipity:
Discovering creativity through chance
In this last one, the group managed to use “discover” and
“creativity” in their definition of serendipity, which I thought was neat.
Students asked me if I had a Twitter account. I don’t. They
said I should go make one. I don’t know about this and I don’t see myself as a
tweeter even though I’ve been reading about the different uses of tweeting in
academic circles. I think I prefer blogging over tweeting. It forces me to
write something a little longer, and hopefully a piece that’s more thoughtful.
Since one of the reasons for blogging was to improve my writing, I was rather
pleased by the referee reports I received last week for my most recent
manuscript. Both reviewers commented that the paper was clearly written. Both
also recommended minor revisions with no further review needed so I was able to
make the edits, resubmit, and it was accepted. A good way to end the month of
September!
No comments:
Post a Comment