The independent
invention of writing took place at least three times in three regions:
Mesopotamia, China and Mesoamerica. (The hieroglyphs of Egypt might have had
connections to Mesopotamia.) Writing is the first I.T. revolution – that’s the
thrust of Amalia Gnanadesikan’s The Writing Revolution: Cuneiform to the Internet published by Wiley-Blackwell.
I’m four chapters
into the book and finding it utterly fascinating! I’ve been learning about
logograms, morphemes, phonemes, and what constitutes a syllabary and an
alphabet. Back in college, for one of my few free electives, I took an
Introduction to Linguistics class. What I found fascinating then, I find even
more fascinating now since Gnanadesikan compares and contrasts speaking and writing
and their evolution through history and culture. Although academic in nature, The Writing Revolution is
straightforward to read as a narrative. Each chapter is crisply written in
15-20 pages, and includes an interesting slant – betrayed by its title.
Chapters 2-4 are Cuneiform: Forgotten
Legacy, Egyptian Hieroglyphs and the
Quest for Eternity, and Chinese: A
Love of Paperwork.
The introductory
chapter, though, was mind-blowing (at least to me). The book isn’t just about
writing; the author is an engaging writer! I will quote three short paragraphs
to demonstrate the author’s prose. The first is the marvelous opener to the chapter.
The second is something I’ve ruminated on when considering whether all my
documents should be stored and accessed in the ubiquitous cloud. The third is simply
mind-blowing to the scientist in me.
“This sentence is
a time machine. I wrote it a long time before you opened this book and read it.
Yet here are my words after all this time, pristinely preserved, as good as new.
The marvelous technology that allows the past to speak directly to the future
in this way is by now so pervasive that we take it for granted: it is writing.”
“Writing was
invented to solve a particular problem: information only existed if someone could
remember it. Once it was gone from memory, it was gone for good. As human
societies became more complex, those attempting to control them found that their
memories were overtaxed. What they needed was an external storage device. What
they came up with is writing.”
“This is the
essence of writing. Writing represents language, but it outlasts the spoken
word. The oldest examples of writing have lasted over five thousand years.
Others will last only until I press my computer’s delete key. But all have the
potential to outlast the words I speak, or the words I put together in my head.
A spoken (or mentally composed) message unfolds in time, one word replacing the previous one as it is uttered. Writing
arranges the message in space, each
word following the previous one in a line. Writing is therefore a process of
translating time into space.”
Translating time into space. That’s a marvelous way of thinking about writing and reading.
It highlights Spritz as an oddly strange way to read; the e-reader translates
space back into time. By flashing one word at a time, it supposedly strips out
the work of moving one’s eyes across and down a page of text thereby allowing
faster and smoother reading. I’ve never tried Spritz, nor have I the desire to
do so. The chemist-philosopher in me enjoys the aesthetic viewing of words
surrounded by ‘white space’. Both are important: Atoms and the Void.
I learned all
manner of interesting factoids from The
Writing Revolution. Scribes and recorders, looking for speed and
efficiency, played a significant role in the evolution of writing. Dead ‘classical’
languages (Latin being a modern-day example) in written form played an
important role in education and the priesthood long after they ceased to be
spoken. The facing of Egyptian hieroglyphs could indicate the direction of the
text but also flourished as an aesthetic part of the text itself. Writing as
art! We see this in Chinese calligraphy today. But much of writing was
practical: record-keeping for an increasing administrative complex. Deciphering
of ancient languages was aided by the egos of long-dead kings. But even as
scholars are able to ‘read’ them and extract meaning, we don’t quite know what
some of these languages might have ‘sounded’. Writing leads to both permanence
and loss, as the ephemeral spoken words evolve and evaporate.
What is the best
way to represent, store and transmit information? Different languages have different
constraints to optimize, but neighboring cultures were quick to trade, borrow
and steal where needed. Historical contingency is ever present as we view the
evolution of languages, both spoken and written. If you are intrigued by the
ever-changing organizing principles of the babble of Babel, then you will enjoy
The Writing Revolution. I highly
recommend it!
Now on to Chapter
5, Maya Glyphs: The Calendar of Kings.
No comments:
Post a Comment