I’m enjoying the beginning of a two-week vacation! Lots of
sleeping, eating good food and enjoying the company of family. There is also
reading leisurely, which I already do regularly even when I’m not on vacation.
What better way to start than with The Slow Professor: Challenging the Culture of Speed in the Academy by Maggie
Berg and Barbara Seeber. I first heard about this book from an Inside HigherEd review. Then, my university organized a faculty summer book club to read it, so
I signed up. (It’s a short read – purposefully so, otherwise you won’t start
reading it because you might feel daunted by the tyranny of time, a subject
tackled by the book.) Since one of my goals for the summer is taking the time
to think by slowing my pace, I decided to start reading the book on the long
plane ride. That way, I could read several pages or sections, then close my
eyes, and think! The importance of taking the time to think, and its importance
to teaching and scholarship, is one key message from Berg and Seeber.
The book takes inspiration from the Slow Food movement
rebelling against the modern agricultural industrial complex. Here, the culprit
is the corporatization of the university. Having taken on heavy administrative
tasks the last few years (before taking a break this year), much of the book
resonates with me. Perhaps I was also primed by reading books about the history
of universities and how administration has taken an increasing role from the
managerial world, in some aspects for the better, but in many other aspects for
the worse. There is no simple solution. Berg and Seeber do not provide one – that
is not their aim. And anyone who claims to have found the magic bullet to
“solve this problem” should probably not be believed. These are the folks who
got us into this situation in the first place.
This reminds me of an essay a couple of months ago by David
West titled The Managerial University: A Failed Experiment? It’s a striking and succinct summary of the problem. Here’s
the third paragraph that sets the stage for the essay: “In their enthusiasm for the
‘new managerialism’ and the ‘modern university’, however, politicians,
bureaucrats and those academics who have hitched their fortunes to the new
model seem wilfully blind to the practical results of their reforms. There is
some truth in their criticisms of the old idea of the university, but in practice
the management of the modern university also leaves too much to be desired.
Some of the problems that beset the new model were anticipated by sceptical
academics. Their criticisms were dismissed as the products of antiquated
thinking and self-interest. What can you expect from academics defending their
own privileges.”
While Berg and Seeber exhort faculty to band together as a
community to resist the corporatization of the university, this message is not
shouted from the rooftops. Rather, it is weaved into a narrative that emphasizes
the benefits of slow-thinking, not slowness in terms of speed but rather in
terms of richness and enjoyment. There is a chapter devoted to the enjoyment of
teaching as a Slow Professor, and another that discusses research and
scholarship. There is also an interesting chapter on ‘collegiality’ and
community-building, as a counterpoint to the individualistic competitive ethos
that permeates corporate culture at its base. This gives the book a very
different tone from the more militant warnings of crisis (which have their
place). Perhaps if we applied some slow-thinking to the current situation, we
may collectively approach a multi-faceted response (there is no “one size fits
all”) to the problems plaguing higher education, instead of allowing disruptive
demagogues to hold sway. Disruption in itself is not a bad thing, but if we are
students of history, we should know that what seems shiny and new is often the
repackaging of old ideas – and we should be reflective and skeptical as
academics.
What else did I bring along for my vacation reading? Two
books that I have recently read, that could do with another round at a slower
and more reflective pace. I mentioned one in a previous blog post, The Vital Question, by Nick Lane on an
interesting and provocative scenario for locating the origin-of-life in
hydrothermal vents. The other is a short but provocative book on learning and
teaching by Frank Smith, The Book of Learning and Forgetting. Here’s the teaser: If you really want to learn
something, there is nothing that can stop you. If you have no interest in
learning something, all the novel pedagogy and tricks will be of no use,
because you will simply forget what you are cramming as soon as you can. The
author traces the institutionalization of learning with unflattering
comparisons to the military complex and managerial standardization, an early
version if you like to the corporate tactics of today.
Here’s to Summer Slow Reading!
No comments:
Post a Comment