Reading philosophy is always a challenge for me, but I am
trying to persevere through Jacques Ellul’s Technological
System. Although written in 1980, close to the rise of the personal desktop
computer, Ellul is remarkably prescient of how computer technology will exert a
degree of unprecedented control over our lives. I’m only a quarter of the way
through (because it is slow reading), and although the author is still setting
the stage, I’m finding it a very sobering read – especially as I think about
education.
For better and for worse, the rise of nationalized education
means that school for both teachers and pupils is, for the most part, embedded
in a vast gargantuan system. It has grown progressively unwieldly with size as
has the corresponding political system that could bring changes. This is in
sharp contrast to the one-room schoolhouse, a small group of students with
perhaps only a single teacher. There is no government-mandated syllabus nor are
students grouped together in classes by age. The older ones help the younger
ones.
Standards and accountability no longer allow for such
freedom and variety. Not that it is inherently bad to have standards, and
accountability is generally a good thing; but good intentions of “maintaining
high standards” has typically devolved into the lowest common denominator as
technology increasingly participates in assessment. Not everything that counts
can be counted. As much as we’d like to think we have autonomy as teachers,
that control is slowly being taken away to be subject to the technological
system.
As teachers it is crucial for us to frame education as a
relationship between persons; I think this is what teaching and learning is all
about. It cannot be easily reduced into its constituent parts. We must resist
the application of Taylorian scientific management to our “industry” (a telling
example of how the terminology has permeated into our field). This has become
increasingly difficult because the advancement of technologies results in an
increasing enslavement to those technologies. It consumes and subsumes everything.
I’m not advocating a Luddite response; I personally benefit from technology –
but it is important to step back and see how it enforces a wider system that
attempts to enforce compliance to a flat, rigid, errorless, efficient, program.
If we lose awareness, we have only ourselves to blame when we all become pawns
serving the system.
I have no solution to this conundrum. Sometimes I wonder if
it is too late. There are systems within systems within systems; their smooth
running enhanced by technology. I think Ellul would say that this puts humanity
in an increasingly un-natural situation to which adaptation also brings a concomitant
increase in stress. It is no wonder that teachers/professors and students seem
increasingly harried. Speed is one measure of efficiency, and our lives are
whizzing by. Technology may have brought us some “leisure” time, but we
increasingly need to fill it with more technology. A vicious cycle perhaps.
Only in a system does this happen.
No comments:
Post a Comment