On a recent drive into work, an unbidden thought crossed my
mind. Is there a trend to how I spend my time as an academic over, say, a
ten-year period? I should know the answer to this question because I have
religiously logged my time every workday ever since my first year as a tenure
track faculty member.
The responsibilities of a faculty member can be divided into
three broad categories: Teaching, Scholarship and Service. The percentage of
time devoted to these areas vary widely certainly across institutions. For
example, along the Teaching-Scholarship continuum, more Scholarship would be
expected at an R1 institution with commensurate low teaching loads. At a
community college, there is usually no formal research requirement, and thus
teaching would weigh heavily. At a selective liberal arts college, teaching
would be very important but faculty members are also expected to engage in
productive quality scholarship, although not as much quantity as an R1
institution. These also vary across disciplines and departments even within an
institution. The area of Service is much more nebulous and may vary
idiosyncratically by individual faculty members depending on their interests
and administrative abilities.
Since I had all the data, I constructed a ten-year snapshot
for my time usage across the three areas. The chart below shows how the
percentage of time spent in each area varies across a ten-year period. A year
is marked by the academic calendar (Sep through Aug), since at my institution
classes begin in early September for the Fall semester and end in late May for
the Spring semester. Year 10 represents last academic year, AY2015-2016, and
Year 1 is therefore AY2006-2007. Note that Year 1 is not my first year as a
faculty member. Otherwise you might have expected to see a very large
percentage of time devoted to teaching. The very first time you teach a course
that’s new to you, the preparatory work is substantial.
My time log is actually more fine-grained than these three
broad categories so I had to make some “lumping” choices. As a faculty member
in a liberal arts college setting, time spent with my undergraduate research
students constitutes both teaching and scholarship. As I see it, having
undergraduates work in my lab is part of their education and much of my time is
spent training and teaching them. However, the time spent with them on their
projects also advances my research agenda. I therefore chose to divide this
equally among teaching and scholarship. Similarly, my “Reading” time is spent
both on teaching/pedagogy and on science/research; I make a similar 50-50
division here. Scholarship includes subcategories such as writing and when I am
directly doing research on my own projects .I lumped together all committee
work, departmental service, administrative work, and other things that do not
fall into Teaching and Scholarship into the broad area of Service.
I had a yearlong sabbatical in Year 5 of the chart
corresponding to the upward spike in Scholarship and the downward spike in
Teaching. Beginning halfway through Year 7 and running through Year 9, I took
on substantial administrative responsibilities at my institution that resulted
in lower formal teaching loads. This resulted in the prominence of Service with
dips in both Teaching and Scholarship. When not on sabbatical or serving as an
administrator, my time contribution to teaching is roughly 50% corresponding to
a typical teaching load of five classes over two semesters. During these years,
Scholarship and Service hover around 25%. Interestingly, even while on
sabbatical, I somehow still spent a substantial 20% of my time in the Service
area. I also thought a lot about my classes, and was working on a new special
topics Origin of Life chemistry course that I was slated to teach in the Fall
after my sabbatical.
Are the semesters different from the summer? Yes, and I have
the chart to prove it! The summer (chart below) is typically where more
research gets done. Undergraduates working in my lab are full-time since they
are not taking classes in the summer. The Teaching percentage mainly hovers in
the 20-30% window: some of it goes to “teaching” my research students and part
of it has to do with preparing for classes in the upcoming Fall semester. In
Year 7, the Teaching spikes because I was leading an interdisciplinary team of
more than ten faculty members teaching a new Scientific Inquiry course across
multiple sections. This took half my time, while Scholarship fell to 10%.
Service was high during the years I took on significant administrative duties.
Administration is year-round and never ends.
During the semesters, the trends in the nine-month chart
(below) look similar to the twelve-month chart. Service remains roughly the
same. Teaching increases by about 10% with a concomitant decrease in
Scholarship by about 10%. During the school year, with the exception of my
sabbatical year and the heavy administrative years, Teaching takes up closer to
60% of my time, with Scholarship dropping to 15% on average.
Across all ten years, the average percentages are Teaching
45%, Scholarship 25% and Service 30%. Am I happy with these overall numbers? I
guess so. But if they were different, I think I would still be happy with them.
I suppose it’s because for the most part, I have the freedom as a faculty
member to choose how I spend my time – a luxury compared to many other
professions. Yes, I have teaching obligations but I greatly look forward to
spending my time in this area. Service is part of being a good citizen of the
institution and the community. Scholarship is where I get to enjoy thinking
broadly about education and science, with the breadth defined by Boyer. The three categories have substantial overlap, for example, I’ve served
multiple years on the curriculum committee, something I’m very interested in
even though it can be tedious at times.
How will I spend my time in future years? I don’t know. At
some later point I might end up in a more administrative role, because I’m very
organized and decently good at management activities. Teaching is still my
favorite activity by far, and my enthusiasm has not flagged in the last ten
years. In fact, if anything I might be more excited about it now then ten years
ago, judging by the number of new ideas I get but have not the time and energy
to implement. I’ve also noticed that I read more widely now compared to when I
was a new assistant professor. Back then, I read very narrowly in my subfield.
My interests have certainly broadened over the years. I can’t believe I’ve been
blogging regularly for 2.5 years. Where does the time go, indeed?
No comments:
Post a Comment