Can you imagine static everlasting music? Sounds
oxymoronic. Imagine a single musical note sounded forever without change. Not
only does this seem boring, it was almost impossible to generate before the
advent of electronic music. The sound of a plucked string fades. The breath of
a horn-blower expires. The clapped cymbal, loud on impact, disappears into the
wind. But the dying sound of a musical note is what gives rise to the
experience of music. One dying tone gives way to another tone, which in turn
dies as yet another is given birth. And this tickles our ears with delight!
If the first tone did not die and new tones were
simply added to it, you may briefly have harmony, but eventually added
dissonant sounds will lead to cacophony. Distinct tones are lost; all becomes
noise. There may be troves of hidden information in the overlapping waves,
interfering with each other constructively and destructively, but the human
listener cannot discern any underlying patterns. It’s the sound of a high
entropy state, seemingly more dead than alive.
Perhaps there is an analogy between music and life
where transience plays a key role. Just as music is alive when one tone gives
way to another, so chemistry becomes alive as molecules transform from one to
another, their concentrations constantly changing over time in a dynamic dance.
A turns into B, which turns into C, then D, then E, then F, then G, and then
A*, an excited form of the original A, its chemical bonds vibrating at double
the frequency of the original. You might call it a scale or a cycle. The scale
establishes a musical key while the cycle establishes a key metabolic process.
What makes music pleasurable? Anticipation,
Expectation, Surprise, Resolution. The masterful composer cycles through themes
– and for the greatest pieces of music, we do not get bored listening to them
again and again and again. The dynamics that make the music so alive are rooted
in larger underlying structures, cycles within larger cycles. The maestro
teases us by building anticipation. An expectation is delightfully thwarted to
reveal a surprise. And the resolution, when it comes later than expected, is
savored.
How much time passed before seemingly simple
molecules, handfuls of atoms connected by chemical bonds, turned into
specifically themed repeating structures? I don’t know. But these delightful
polymers, when located within an energy flow, build up and break down.
Repeating units are taken apart and put back together. The prelude to this
grand opus starts in simplicity – how can it not? We don’t know where it is
headed. The maestro may have many hidden surprises. But as the chemical music
proceeds, we begin to see the themes and the repeating structures, but before
the first cell, it would have been difficult to predict how chemistry would
give rise to biology – endless forms most beautiful, yet with the same
underlying chemistry.
All living things die. Those that do not die, we do
not call alive. But it is death that gives way to life. Without the transience
of life, there would be no living. Dynamism is the feature of life. Dynamism is
the feature of music. Music must be performed and listened to. It must be experienced
bodily – not just through tiny hair-like structures in the inner ear, but
through the cavities and substances of our entire human body. Waves of
different frequencies resonate through different structures. You can read a
musical score, see the squiggle of notes on a static page, and analyze its
themes in great detail. But to truly delight in the music, you must bodily
experience it. The notes don’t truly come alive until you experience them as
transient tones passing through time.
In my lifetime, I’ve drawn many chemical structures
on paper. I connect them to each other in complicated schemes. My mind’s eye
imagines how these molecules, too small for me to bodily see, transform from
one to another in an elaborate dance. One day, the community of scientists may
draw out a grand scheme and call it “the chemical origins of life”. It might
seem like a huge intellectual achievement, but it may be akin to writing out
the score of a grand musical opus, one that has been played again and again,
but it’s taken us so long to develop the notation. Drawn chemical representations
are like musical notes. Are physical molecules like the tones of music?
No comments:
Post a Comment