Yesterday I attended a cybersecurity talk aimed
generally at university faculty and staff. It was mostly attended by staff
related to I.T. and digital services (library, educational resources, etc) and
there were hardly any faculty – that’s too bad, but perhaps not surprising
since faculty members tend to think they’re too busy for such events even when
they are well-advertised and scheduled at a convenient time.
I was familiar with most of the material since it
centered around phishing attacks, their strategies, and how to avoid being a
victim. For many years now I’ve served on university committees related to
informational technology. And these phishing attacks are getting more numerous
and sophisticated. Maybe most faculty members correctly deduced the content and
thought that they already knew the needed information. Why waste time attending
a seminar delivered by an I.T. professional?
Although the speaker was not the most dynamic, she
cleverly kept the audience involved with Poll Everywhere questions and small
prizes. But to me the eye-opener was her demonstration of the tools that
hackers use. I had never seen such live-demos before and I was floored by how
easy it was to use free hacking tools. I had imagined someone needing detailed
sysadmin information plowing their way through jungles of back-door code. But
no! Within seconds, anyone could set up a variety of nefarious schemes by just
choosing from menu options. Clone a login page? Set up a fake pdf attachment?
Insert a power script? Use a keylogger? I saw it being done in a matter of seconds.
For me, that was an attention grabber.
I always imagined that seeing such easy-to-use ‘software’
in a movie or TV drama was fake – like when CSI would show chemical analyzer
software that spits out the exact compound identity when a heterogeneous sample
was loaded on to the (spectrometer) ‘machine’. Easy-to-use scamming software
isn’t fake. It can be deployed quickly and effectively. I shudder to think at
what the proprietary versions can do – according to the seminar speaker, there
were many more options and the free version was somewhat limited.
Demos are popular in chemistry because they catch
the students’ attention. That being said, many of them are more of the ‘that’s
cool’ variety rather than significantly demonstrating the power and strangeness
of chemistry. Part of this is the disconnect between the nanoscope world of
atoms and molecules that we cannot observe directly and the macroscopic world
which blurs or statistically lumps together what can be observed by our naked
eyes. Computer simulations can somewhat bridge this gap, and can eye-poppingly
demonstrate the intricacy of chemistry at the molecular level, but it doesn’t
seem ‘real’. And it’s not. The simulation is often a simplified approximation;
modeling the full system would be intractable. Chemistry hackers do amazing
work, but it can be challenging to demonstrate this power to a broader
audience. We need better hacker tools.
No comments:
Post a Comment