I’ve been pondering the medieval practice of
craftsmen (& craftswomen!) and apprenticeship. In a mostly agrarian
society, if you weren’t tending the fields or the flocks for a living, you
might be sent off to learn a trade. Blacksmith comes to mind when I think about
medieval craftsmen, but you could just as well be apprenticed to an embroiderer
or a potter. But let’s use the blacksmith example for now.
My un-researched impression is that medieval craftsmen
did not regularly take on multiple apprentices. If you currently had one, you’d
be loath to take on a second. It’s not like you have several forges and extra
equipment to run a blacksmithing class. You’d want to see if your potential
apprentice had what it takes before taking on this person for a long
commitment. Assuming no glaring problems, you’d then spend however many years
it took with one-on-one instruction. The skills you have acquired as an expert
blacksmith took many years of practice, and to maintain your reputation, your
apprentice had better learn well.
Today’s classroom of one teacher to tens or maybe
hundreds of students is a rather modern invention. Did it arise as population
density increased, and there just needed to be a place to plop these
youngsters? I don’t know, but I’m sure someone has written a history. In any
case, as a society we somehow decided that everyone needed to know some “basics”
– reading, writing, arithmetic, and eventually more. As knowledge in different
areas grew and became increasingly diversified, more was piled into the
curriculum. Craftsmen of the medieval slant disappeared, replaced by industrial
machines. Cogs and the conveyor belt moved things along in a factory. The modern
educational-industrial complex seems to have imbibed some of the same flavor.
The medieval craftsman had a physical product. For the
blacksmith, these could be hoes, horseshoes, or hand-axes. The embroiderer and
the potter would similarly have a product to display or sell. Were there
craftsmen who did not craft a physical product? Perhaps a bard or a storyteller
could make a living by providing a service; ephemeral it may be but there were
those willing to pay for these services. Tutors for one’s children were not far
behind, at least for the few who were wealthy. So perhaps teaching could be
thought of as a service-craft. It does not produce a physical object as a
product. It’s end-product, an “educated” individual is not so easy to classify.
I’d like to think of myself as a craftsman of
sorts. Teaching is my craft. Over years of experience I’ve honed it well, or at
least well-suited to the ethos of a classroom of the liberal arts college. My
ballast of knowledge is chemistry, i.e., I’m at my best when teaching
chemistry, and would probably do poorly teaching in areas where I had little
subject knowledge. Part of my life mirrors the medieval craftsman – when I take
on research students. They work with me one-on-one learning how to do research
in computational chemistry, and how to think like a chemist. I’d like to think
the experience is somewhat helpful for the students, even though it’s nowhere
as intensive or extensive as a medieval apprentice would be getting. My
students learn some, but honestly, not all that much in the short timeframe.
It’s a challenge to evaluate the “product” of my
craftsmanship. Yes, one can count the number of papers I’ve published, research
students I’ve mentored, grants I’ve written that were funded, etc. And yes,
these are counted, because there’s not much else that can be easily counted and
evaluated. I’d like to think that I have personally contributed to the “education”
of many an individual, but it’s hard to evaluate this. (And yes, I do read all
the comments in my end-of-semester teaching evaluations.) Sometimes a former
student tells me years later how something I said or did helped them greatly,
but those are few and far between, and typically I’d spent one-on-one time in
my office chatting with said student on multiple occasions. But for the other one
to two thousand students that have passed through my “class”, I can say little
to how much I’ve impacted them. Perhaps little.
How did we come up with “mass” education? I’ve
scoped out a few books to read this summer to learn more about the history. I
think it will be important to gain some historical perspective as we stand on
the brink of a new kind of mass-education, one driven by technology, especially
thanks to the current Covid-19 pandemic. Technology can both aid or confound
teaching, when used well or badly, but technology shouldn’t drive education. Witnessing
the rise in “edupreneurship” driven by tech-entrepreneurs, many of whom have
little to no teaching experience or expertise is scary. They might say I’m a
relic. Outmoded. Like the medieval craftsman who is no more. I don’t harken to
living in medieval times, but perhaps there’s something we can learn from
thinking about education as a craft, one that requires time and care, and that industrial
efficiency isn’t the most important thing in the world.
No comments:
Post a Comment